<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you responsible or simply accountable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/2010/04/09/are-you-responsible-or-simply-accountable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/2010/04/09/are-you-responsible-or-simply-accountable/</link>
	<description>High performance teams: Lower costs ahead of schedule</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Normand Frenette</title>
		<link>http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/2010/04/09/are-you-responsible-or-simply-accountable/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Normand Frenette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/?p=161#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry for your experience.  I don&#039;t disagree that there is a lot of &quot;corporate talk&quot; that expects teams where none exist. But it is not my experience that teams cannot exist at work. Even if I buy into the &quot;island&quot;, there are often situations where these islands come together because it is in their best interest to be part of a team.

You do raise a good point: I do not think that there is such thing as &quot;team responsibility&quot;. There is of course, &quot;team accountability&quot;.  But responsibility is a personal thing, one must declare it for oneself.  Teams can only be responsible, because each member took on - by choice - the responsibility of success.  That is indeed a powerful - high performance - team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry for your experience.  I don&#8217;t disagree that there is a lot of &#8220;corporate talk&#8221; that expects teams where none exist. But it is not my experience that teams cannot exist at work. Even if I buy into the &#8220;island&#8221;, there are often situations where these islands come together because it is in their best interest to be part of a team.</p>
<p>You do raise a good point: I do not think that there is such thing as &#8220;team responsibility&#8221;. There is of course, &#8220;team accountability&#8221;.  But responsibility is a personal thing, one must declare it for oneself.  Teams can only be responsible, because each member took on &#8211; by choice &#8211; the responsibility of success.  That is indeed a powerful &#8211; high performance &#8211; team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Normand Frenette</title>
		<link>http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/2010/04/09/are-you-responsible-or-simply-accountable/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Normand Frenette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/?p=161#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Your experience mirrors most people I have encountered.  You are absolutely correct.

It is true that we are often made accountable without all the authority we need.  In fact, I think it is always the case: authority will be limited because it is bound to bump against somebody else&#039;s.  So assigning authority correctly is a wild goose chase. My first recommendation is to recognize this fact: nobody can ever be assigned all the authority they need. Success lies outside simple authority.

My second recommendation - you may or may not like it.  Decide if you want to be responsible or not.  As Isaid, it is your choice and yours alone.  If you decide you are responsible, you will discover that you can get what you need - even without the authority.  I have observed in multiple companies that people who declare themselves responsible act in a certain way: people want to be around them, people want to help them, people want to be part of their teams etc.  It sounds strange but try it: look for somebody at work who makes stuff happen, and chances are the &quot;stuff&quot; that happens is beyond his or her sphere of responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your experience mirrors most people I have encountered.  You are absolutely correct.</p>
<p>It is true that we are often made accountable without all the authority we need.  In fact, I think it is always the case: authority will be limited because it is bound to bump against somebody else&#8217;s.  So assigning authority correctly is a wild goose chase. My first recommendation is to recognize this fact: nobody can ever be assigned all the authority they need. Success lies outside simple authority.</p>
<p>My second recommendation &#8211; you may or may not like it.  Decide if you want to be responsible or not.  As Isaid, it is your choice and yours alone.  If you decide you are responsible, you will discover that you can get what you need &#8211; even without the authority.  I have observed in multiple companies that people who declare themselves responsible act in a certain way: people want to be around them, people want to help them, people want to be part of their teams etc.  It sounds strange but try it: look for somebody at work who makes stuff happen, and chances are the &#8220;stuff&#8221; that happens is beyond his or her sphere of responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/2010/04/09/are-you-responsible-or-simply-accountable/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/?p=161#comment-37</guid>
		<description>In my experience, its common to be assigned responsibility for a project while not getting the authority that&#039;s really required to execute on it.

Do you have any suggestions on how to handle that situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, its common to be assigned responsibility for a project while not getting the authority that&#8217;s really required to execute on it.</p>
<p>Do you have any suggestions on how to handle that situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/2010/04/09/are-you-responsible-or-simply-accountable/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ktsprocess.com/highperformance/?p=161#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Fact of the matter is, imo, we are islands unto ourselves at work truly, and we are members of the &quot;team&quot; because that is the corporate model we are forced to follow...therein lies the problem of &quot;team&quot; vs &quot;individual&quot; responsibility.  Corporations are not modeled after human nature - human nature in a competitive environment that is, where each of us is trying to grab the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.  There is no &quot;team&quot; in that endeavor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact of the matter is, imo, we are islands unto ourselves at work truly, and we are members of the &#8220;team&#8221; because that is the corporate model we are forced to follow&#8230;therein lies the problem of &#8220;team&#8221; vs &#8220;individual&#8221; responsibility.  Corporations are not modeled after human nature &#8211; human nature in a competitive environment that is, where each of us is trying to grab the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.  There is no &#8220;team&#8221; in that endeavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

